Tuesday, February 19, 2013

The Wrong Way - Richard R. Crocker



The Wrong Way
United Church of Christ at Dartmouth College
First Sunday in Lent
February 17,2013
Richard R. Crocker
Deuteronomy 26:1-11
Romans 10:8-13
Luke 4:1-13

            I am relieved that I have been invited back to the Church of Christ at Dartmouth, and especially so since it is not yet again Transfiguration Sunday. Relieved, yet challenged, for preaching on this first Sunday in Lent requires a great deal of honesty and self-examination --- qualities that we might think always characterize worship, but qualities that are especially important in Lent and qualities that, perhaps more often than not, can make us uncomfortable.

            Indeed, I must begin with an uncomfortable word of warning. Three words of warning actually, because the story of Jesus’ three temptations is indeed a warning  - a warning to us individually, and to the whole church, that just as Jesus was tempted in three ways, so also may we expect to be tempted. And although Jesus resisted all the temptations of Satan, we are not able to do so. Indeed, we often succumb to temptation, and in doing so, we go the wrong way.

            The wrong way. I was brought up going to Sunday School during my whole childhood – now in the distant past - and a distinctive feature of that experience, from the very earliest times, was the task of mastering a weekly memory verse – that is a verse of scripture to be memorized each Sunday, beginning with the simplest (yet most profound) truth that “God is love,” (John 4:8)  and “Be ye kind one to another,” (Ephesians 4:32) and proceeding to lengthier ones. Memorizing is now out of fashion in educational theory in general, and certainly in Christian education; it is as out of fashion as the King James Bible, which was, of course, the only truly authorized version, so truly authorized that most of us grew up convinced that Jesus himself spoke Elizabethan English. So I can’t help it if I still think of scripture first in Elizabethan English, and in terms that are certainly not gender neutral, even though of course we know that such language is no longer viewed as inclusively as it was once seen.  So you will forgive me, I hope, for opening our service today with a hymn found only in the Pilgrim Hymnal; it certainly could not be rendered acceptable for the New Century. And you will forgive me when I preface the rest of my remarks, and make my text, one of those memory verses of long ago that came stubbornly and persistently to my mind as I contemplated today’s message. The verse is this, from Proverbs (14:12): “There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.”(Not even grammatical, but there it is.) This verse described, for my teenage-self, and for my now old self, and for us all  - men and women, the essence of temptation. “There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.”

            For you see, we are generally not tempted to do what we know clearly is wrong. Rather, we are tempted to do what seems right, or what we can justify or rationalize as right; and then we may discover that we have in fact taken the wrong way.

            The wrong way is laid out for us in the story of Jesus’ temptation. Almost all of our own temptations, and the temptations of the church, are summarized here. Jesus is hungry, and Satan tempts him to eat bread – to make a stone into bread. This is the temptation to seek our salvation, our ultimate well-being, in materialism – to think, contrary to scripture, that we really do live by bread alone. It is the temptation to acquire goods, to nurture our outward physical selves while neglecting or discounting that which makes us truly beings made in God’s image. And no temptation holds greater sway over many of us who live in our affluent world than the temptation to make material goods the purpose of our lives. Jesus knew this was the wrong way, but it has seemed the right way to many of us – individuals and church – and we have gone down that path, traveling  a long way on it, perhaps before we discover, to our sorrow, that it is the wrong way. Indeed, we may travel so far on it that we end up as the man Jesus described , the one who gained the whole world but lost his soul.

The second temptation that Jesus faced is the desire for power. Satan showed the whole world to Jesus and said, “I’ll give you the power over this world if only you worship me.” Now, this is frightening. It’s frightening to think that Satan has power over the world, but a little thought makes us realize that those who have power will do almost anything to preserve it. We may start out wanting power to do good. But we end up wanting power to keep our power. “There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.” There is nothing more intoxicating than power – the power to exercise our wishes over others – wishes that we may justify and rationalize as  being in the best interest of others, but which are really, we come to realize, in the best interests of ourselves. We may start out seeking power to do good, but, all too often, in the history of states, churches, businesses, families even, we discover that we have gone the wrong way.

            It is the third temptation, however, that perhaps calls for the strongest word of warning for us today. It is, you recall, that Jesus is taken to a high place, the pinnacle of the temple, and told to jump off, so that God will catch him before he falls. Surely, seeing this, Satan argues, the people will be amazed and listen to him. But Jesus replied (in the words of the NRSV) “You shall not put the Lord your God to the test”, or, in the King James version, “Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.” Now you may well say, this is not a temptation for me at all. I have no desire to jump off a temple pinnacle. Why do you say that this is the greatest temptation of all? You do not need to warn me about jumping off of towers.” Well, what I mean is this: Jesus was told by Satan that he should show that he was exempt from the ordinary laws of humanity. He should prove that he was an exception. And I believe, based on experience with myself and with others, that our most common temptation is to think that we are exceptions, that we are somehow exempt from the laws that govern others. Now, although it is true perhaps that Jesus could have claimed a special exemption from harm, he obviously did not. Although he could have avoided death, he did not. Although he could have avoided suffering, he did not. Or perhaps he knew that he could not. If he was truly to be, for us, a savior, a fully human one, he could not be exempt from the  perils that beset all of us. Yet it is our temptation to think, often and perhaps always, that we are exempt from the perils of life. Somehow affliction should not come near us; we should not experience the deprivations, cruelty, violence, oppression, and injustice that so afflicts others in the world. This belief was put to me quite bluntly when a student, a number of years ago, --- a young woman, a devoted evangelical Christian who was disappointed that she had not found suitable employment before graduation –asked me: ”What’s the point of being a Christian if God doesn’t help you get the job you want?” This young woman said what many of us truly believe. We believe that our faith gives us special claims to be exempt from the very nature of humanity. Such a belief is not only wrong, it is extremely dangerous. When we began to believe that we are especially entitled to exemptions from humanity’s perils, we are headed the wrong way. “There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the ends thereof are the ways of death.” We who claim that Jesus Christ is our teacher, our Lord, and our Savior – how can we believe such a thing? He who spared not himself, but gave himself up for us all – is this a man who told us that we ourselves should have exemption from woe? No, not at all. Of course, we believe that we are in God’s hands, no matter what. But being in God’s hand, no matter what, is not at all the same thing as thinking we are entitled to avoid human suffering and limitation.

            I am afraid that all too often we go the wrong way because of a mistaken idea of faith; we confuse the promise of salvation with a promise of privilege – and in Christian life there is no promise of privilege. There is only the promise that, in our suffering, we are joined with the suffering of Christ, he who did not seek exemption, but who brought redemption – that is, he who by his suffering has made our suffering a meaningful part of the larger context of God’s work in this world. Our suffering is not to be sought or desired – just as Jesus did not seek or desire suffering – but it is to be expected, accepted, and transformed through faith. Even when we face the greatest suffering that the world can deal out to us, such as those parents who recently lost their children in a senseless slaying, we remember that God has not promised us exemption from suffering but redemption of suffering. How can we look at the cross of Christ and expect otherwise? The good news for us is not that we are immune to the human condition, but that God is deeply immersed with us in the human condition, and that by his suffering, we are healed. Our own suffering is transformed into compassion, and it is this compassion that will heal the world. When we think otherwise, we go wrong. We come to feel entitled rather than blessed, privileged rather than supported, special rather than simply accepted.

            “There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.” If we are to follow the path of life, we must remember the cross – which seemed to the world the way to death, but which has become, for us, the way to true life. For beyond the cross is life, health, peace. The world has not yet fully learned this way. Instead, it tempts us with the promises of materialism, power, and privilege. During Lent, we examine ourselves and ask: How have we succumbed to temptation? Are we going the wrong way?” The good news is that Christ died to save sinners – not because he was impressed with our righteousness. It is grace that helps us to know we are on the wrong way, and grace that turns us round. In the words of the hymn, “It was grace that taught my heart to fear, and grace my fears relieved.” During Lent, we remember again the way that our Savior chose. He fully trusted in a way of servanthood,  non-violence, and sharing. This is the way that appears to the world foolishness, but to us who are being saved, it is the power of God and the wisdom of God.

Amen.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

"Eternity Within our Hearts", Steve Swayne



Rollins Chapel, February 3, 2013
Steve Swayne, Professor of Music, homilist

This homily is offered in honor of the many Dartmouth community members whose music making has greatly enriched my life and the lives of countless others.

Prelude: Johannes Brahms, Sonata in D minor for Violin and Piano, op. 108, mvts. 1 & 2
Emily Hyun, violin; Richard Fu, piano

Hymn: For The Beauty Of The Earth

1 For the beauty of the earth,
for the glory of the skies,
for the love which from our birth
over and around us lies,

[Refrain:]
God of all, to you we raise
this our hymn of grateful praise.

2 For the beauty of each hour
of the day and of the night,
hill and vale, and tree and flower,
sun and moon, and stars of light, [Refrain]

3 For the joy of human love,
brother, sister, parent, child,
friends on earth and friends above,
for all gentle thoughts and mild, [Refrain]

4 For each perfect gift sublime
to our race so freely given;
graces human and divine,
flowers of earth and buds of heaven. [Refrain]

Reading: Ecclesiastes 3:1–14

There is a time for everything,
          and a season for every activity under the heavens:
          a time to be born and a time to die,
          a time to plant and a time to uproot,
          a time to kill and a time to heal,
          a time to tear down and a time to build,
          a time to weep and a time to laugh,
          a time to mourn and a time to dance,
          a time to scatter stones and a time to gather them,
          a time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing,
          a time to search and a time to give up,
          a time to keep and a time to throw away,
          a time to tear and a time to mend,
          a time to be silent and a time to speak,
          a time to love and a time to hate,
          a time for war and a time for peace.

What do workers gain from their toil? I have seen the burden God has laid on the human race. He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the human heart; yet no one can fathom what God has done from beginning to end. I know that there is nothing better for people than to be happy and to do good while they live. That each of them may eat and drink, and find satisfaction in all their toil—this is the gift of God. (New International Version)

Invocation: Lord of all, to You I raise
        These words and thoughts, in grateful praise.

Can the beauty of the Brahms
        Cause combatants to seek peace?
Can sonatas stifle bombs?
        Can song make all warfare cease?
I believe in music’s place
        In making us a better race.

Yes, I know that music can
        Compel us to the barricade
To fight against our fellow man,
        To fight for those who need our aid.
Music is a potent force
        That can, unbidden, set our course.

Will you agree there is a time
        For music and a time for none?
Since music can compel us, I’m
        Convinced our work has just begun
To wrestle with a larger task:
        From us, pray, what does music ask?

Ponder how our yearnings let
        Our lives be lived in fits and starts.
Meanwhile, we read God has set
        Eternity within our hearts.
Might music center us in sound
        That bids us seek more timeless ground?

For sound there is, and sound are we
        When we seek sound to make us whole,
When, unapologetically,
        We seek for music such a role:
Come, push us into higher spheres!
        Come, reach beyond our mortal years!

Imagine how we might draw near
        To such ineffable delight,
To trust in things we only hear,
        Believing they can make us right,
To practice toward that selfless cause
        Of harmony and not applause!

Do we dare to aspire thus,
        To make earth more like heaven above?
Indeed, we must. It’s up to us
        In making music, sharing love
And art and faith and hope and grace
        In concert, freed from time and space.

Closing prayer: Lord of all, to You we raise
        Our hearts and lives, in grateful praise.

Monday, November 5, 2012

"God is ... Mind" - Professor Peter Bien



GOD IS . . . MIND
Peter Bien

          We are always told that God is love.  Might we extend this by saying that God is also mind?  Perhaps, although I’m sure that some (even many) will object.
          In exploring this, let’s start from the very beginning: chapter 1 of Genesis: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.  The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep.”  The earth was without form and void.  It can’t be both.  If it is “without form”—that is “formless”—it consists of unformed substance; it is not void.  So, a choice is given here.  Theologians exploit this by saying that God is either volitional (creating something out of nothing, out of a void, by wishing it) or rational (transforming formlessness into form, chaos into cosmos, by an act of intelligence, of mind).  A loving God can wish the universe out of nothing.  But a God who transforms chaos into cosmos needs to be an intellectual power capable of forming the formless.  The editors of the Revised Standard Version prefer rationality over volition, since they declare, “Out of primordial chaos God created an orderly world.”  They declare as well that creation out of nothing was a later doctrine and cite Maccabees 7:28: “. . . look at the sky and the earth.  Consider everything you see there, and realize that God made it all from nothing . . . “.  I, too, prefer the rational God—or why not both rational and volitional?  Let’s give Him or Her a mind for thought, organization, and understanding, as well as a heart for loving. 
          There is still more evidence for mind in Genesis 1.  Remember, “darkness was upon the face of the deep. . . . And God said, ‘Let there be light’ . . .” (verse 3).  But sun, moon, and stars don’t come until verse 16, two day’s later.  I once did an extensive study of the meaning of “light” in Genesis.  I discovered that all the ancient sources equate this light with intelligence, enlightenment—in other words, with mind: the divine power that organizes, giving form to the formless.  The ancients were entirely clear about this.  Listen to Plotinus (3rd century A.D.): “The One [God] remains absolutely at rest, and Intellect springs from it like light from the sun.”  Light here is equated with God’s intellectual energy, the divine Mind that creates differentiation out of undifferentiated chaos, the finite out of the infinite.  Listen also to Saint Thomas Aquinas (13th century): “Brightness . . . agrees with the property of the Son [S-O-N, NOT S-U-N], as the Word, which is the light and splendor of the intellect.”  A modern Biblical scholar concludes that the Word in John’s Gospel, equated with both Light and God, is “the rational principle in the universe, its meaning, plan or purpose.”  Finally, listen to Dante (late 13th, early 14th century): “All that which dies and all that cannot die / Reflect the radiance of that Idea / Which God the Father through His love begets: / That Living Light, which from its radiant Source / Streams forth.”  Here, wonderfully, the two possibilities are joined, light being the “Idea” generated by “love.” Yes, God can be both love and mind.                                       
          The overall topic for this term’s chapel services is “Loving God with Your Mind.”  That’s why I am attracted to Romans 7:25 as an appropriate Biblical verse:  “On my own I can serve God’s law only with my mind, while my human nature serves the law of sin.” Or, as more freely translated in the New English Bible, “I myself, subject to God’s law as a rational being, am yet, in my unspiritual nature, a slave to the law of sin.”  This seems to derive from Stoic philosophy, which greatly influenced early Christian thinkers.  The Stoic view was that God equals nature and that nature is rational.  Accordingly we, imitating God and thereby fulfilling our own natures, should strive to be rational, loving God with our minds.  I qualified this view at the start by saying “Perhaps” and by worrying “that some (even many) will object.”  Indeed Saint Augustine, at the end of the 4th century, did vigorously object to Stoic influence, claiming that it exhibited “an exorbitant belief in the power of human reason and the ability of the wise man to perfect himself,” a belief that “struck at the heart of Christian teaching, by ignoring the Fall and eliminating the need for divine grace”.1  It is hard to argue against Saint Augustine, and furthermore hard to argue against postmodern philosophical thinking with its emphasis on the vagueness and imprecision of everything, on the omnipresence of mutability, the absence of any final point of stability in the swirl of existence.  But I am a Quaker and Quakers really do not place the Fall at the center of Christian belief.  We were of course accused of heresy on this account, perhaps justifiably; nevertheless Quakers in general and I in particular are more attracted to the conviction—at least the hope—that by imitating God we may become capable of thinking and acting rationally.  The Stoic philosopher Epictetus (ca. A.D. 50–130), whose ultimate guru was Socrates, put it this way: “Socrates fulfilled himself by attending to nothing except reason in everything he encountered.  And you, although you are not yet a Socrates, should live as someone who at least wants to be a Socrates.”2
          This appeals to me because I believe that we and our circumambient universe are part of a cosmic order established in the beginning when God said “Let there by light.”  As I observe and contemplate the regularity of sunrise and sunset, the circling of planets around stars, the predictable cycle of living creatures’ birth, growth, maturation, reproduction, and senescence, the intricate interdependence of animate and inanimate creation, I really do sense rationality at work around me and inside me.  Of course unpredictability, chance, and inexplicability are also present, but I prefer to see them as defects of our system rather than that system’s essence.  The Stoics assert that this cosmic order is constituted by Zeus (God).  I am not a “creationist,” but if God is just shorthand for “the nature of things”—the predictable regularity characterizing cosmic order—then I have no problem.  Indeed, I can subscribe to the Quaker assurance that something of God— something of the rational universe—resides in each person.
          Of course a viable religious system should be more than just a comfortable intellectual doctrine; it should also direct our behavior.  If God is mind as well as love, then we, imitating deity, should behave rationally.  Perhaps we ascribe good behavior chiefly to love.  That is fine; however, good behavior must also derive from understanding, discrimination, correct choices, allegiance to a reasonable table of values, the ability to differentiate between that which is subject to our control and that which is beyond our control.  In sum, good behavior depends not only on love but also on rationality, perhaps (who knows?) primarily on rationality.
          In any case, although we are always told that God is love, I hope that I have convinced you that we may extend this by saying that God is also mind, even though some (even many) will object.


Hanover, New Hampshire
October 30, 2012.


NOTES
1 Noel Malcolm, reviewing Christopher Brooke’s “Philosophic Pride” in TLS, September 28, 2012, p. 5.
2 A. A. Long, Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002), p. 272, citing Epictetus’s Encheiridion 51.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Knowing God - Judy Anne Williams




The idea of seeking to “love God with our minds” raises a pretty basic question. How can we love what we do not know? And yet, how is it possible to truly know God, the infinite, the Creator, the Source of Life? On the one hand, Jeremiah tells us that God has said,

Do not let the wise boast in their wisdom, do not let the mighty boast in their might, do not let the wealthy boast in their wealth; but let those who boast boast in this, that they understand and know me, that I am the Lord.  (Jer 9:23-24).

Come,” my heart says, “seek his face!” Your face, Lord, do I seek. (Ps 27:8).

But although we are told metaphorically to seek God’s face, it is clear that this isn’t our literal charge. In fact, the Hebrew Scriptures repeatedly and rather graphically assert that God’s holiness is so enormous and unapproachable that it is not meant for our human bodies. Nobody wants to burst into flames, people!
So the question then becomes, what is the nature of this knowledge of God that we are supposed to attain, how are we to do it, and how will it allow us to love God more dearly?
One simple way to know God, of course, is through His works. In the 19th Psalm, the poet says,
1 The heavens speak the glory of God;
   and the firmament
* proclaims his handiwork.
2 Day unto day pours forth speech,
   and night unto night declares knowledge.
  (Ps 19:1-2)
Having been raised without faith, my first inklings of the Divine were in my experiences of the natural world. “Majesty” is not a concept that Americans are very down with, but that was exactly the reaction that I had to encountering the beauty of Creation in its most natural state (often through trips “up” here to New Hampshire from my native land of Boston). I think many people have had that spiritual encounter, and some of them made their way to college up here in the North Country.
I do want to say that my early sense of the Divine in nature was more than just, “This is so pretty, there must be a God who created it!” I don’t personally need a concept of “intelligent design” to see the Divine in the Creation, nor do I have a problem with evolution, or geological time. Creation is the more beautiful to me in the infinitesimal time of its development, the endless turning of the earth’s crust, the cascade of random mutations over millions of years creating the chameleon’s swiveling eye. I don’t need a God with hands to have molded it all out of clay in some specific amount of time. The ancient light of the stars, the descendants of the Big Bang, are no less a testament, in my heart, to the existence of God.
I see the Divine in the Creation when I am pierced by its beauty, but also by seeing its overwhelming power. The primary sport in my family during my childhood was whitewater boating. If you’ve ever tried to pick up even a large bucket of water, you have a visceral sense of how surprisingly much it weighs. River flow is measured in CFS, or cubic feet per second, and whitewater is created when a great weight of water, powered by the undeniable force of gravity, hits the resistance of unmovable rocks. When you are in the midst of a churning mass of thousands of pounds of water, your mortality, and the limits of your human power, are very obvious.  It was humbling in a way that was sometimes terrifying, but also spoke to me, even before I knew what faith might be, about my place in a relationship with a force that was clearly far greater than me. By working in collaboration with that power, I could come safely to the end of a small, but intensely thrilling journey.
Like others before me, I also see God in my fellow human beings. I’m not just talking about the cool stuff that we sometimes create, although it can be impressive. If you’ve never seen the giant arch in St. Louis, it’s incredible, and as magnificent as a mountainside. But to me, the truest testament is our occasional ability to transcend our animal origins and our inherent sinfulness. I think the fact that we manage to love each other at all is miraculous. Look at me. I’m annoying! I talk too much, I’m a know-it-all, I’m impulsive and emotional and I can get really self-righteous. Somehow across the divides of all of our many faults, we manage to connect with each other. And not just connect, but love ,deeply and unconditionally. If there were not a loving Divine, how would this ever be possible? I think we might all have killed each other long ago.
I’ve been talking about a lot of personal experience, but there’s actually a scriptural basis, and Christian theology, behind these assertions, even if I might have come to them initially in a non-intellectual way.  In the Gospel of John, Jesus says, ‘Righteous Father, the world does not know you, but I know you; and these know that you have sent me. I made your name known to them, and I will make it known, so that the love with which you have loved me may be in them, and I in them.’ (John 17:25-26). I usually use the NRSV, but I like the translation of this passage from Ephesians in the New International Version: ” 13 And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit.” (Eph 1:13).
More “conservative” Christians than myself interpret the larger context of these passages as indicating the necessity of a specific belief in Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah. The message is that to be a true follower, and to receive the salvation that Christ offers, one has to profess a particular belief in Jesus’ role as the Son of God, the exclusive incarnation of the Father. Without this action of mind and will, access to the grace of the New Covenant is lost. It’s not at all difficult to see the Gospel of John in this manner, and I would never “argue” with those who base their theology in this approach.
However, I have chosen and pursued a different strain of Christianity in my journey, a more “liberal” (or even “radical”) denomination that focuses on opening doors and creating an inclusive community of “Seekers of Truth.” We look to the authority of our communities and of tradition, but we also emphasize a mystical relationship with God over Biblical literalism and scholasticism. Our sense is that our “knowledge” is grounded in the gift of the Holy Spirit, which has resulted from our “inclusion” in Christ’s closeness to and knowledge of the Eternal Father. Christ, the active, loving, Divine principle, which existed before the incarnation, has come to give us a new knowledge of God. He continues with us through the Holy Spirit.
When we embrace that knowledge of God, we are transformed, regardless of our attestations. In my experience, opening one’s heart to the Divine power through the Holy Spirit inspires a new level of clarity and unhappiness about one’s own sinfulness, and an urgent desire to live in the Way of Light and holiness. Every step of the Christian journey then proceeds from that process. Our Way is one of service, humility, and love. Or, as Paul names them in Galatians, the “fruits of the spirit are: “Patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.” (Gal 5:22-23).
We will always be aware that our knowledge of God is imperfect, and incomplete. “How weighty to me are your thoughts, O God! How vast is the sum of them! I try to count them – they are more than the grains of sand by the sea.” (Ps 139:17-18). We live with our smallness, our inability to fully know the Creator. The day when we may “see face to face” is not yet with us. But, through grace, we may still know and be known by God, in a way that does not require perfection of knowledge, or of ourselves, but only the simple choice to step forward, arms open, into the relationship with the infinite Divine.


Benediction:
Jesus said to us, “I will not leave you comfortless…But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you everything, and remind you of all that I have said to you. 27Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled, and do not let them be afraid.” (John 14:18, 26-27)
May God make you an instrument of His peace.
Amen.